Homebuilders are understandably concerned about their potential liability in the event a dispute arises with any of their customers either prior to or after closing. Rather than relying on the legislature to protect them, homebuilders should rely primarily upon their contracts to reasonably allocate the risks between them and their customers. This article will discuss contractual limitation clauses which reduce the period of time within which claims may be brought.
Generally construction defect claims must be initiated within two years of when they “accrue”. A claim accrues when a homeowner discovers “the physical manifestations of a defect.” The homeowner does not need to know the cause of the defect for a claim to accrue. For example, if a homeowner observes water coming down her wall her claim accrues at that time even though she doesn’t know if the problem was caused by improper roofing, improper flashing or improper construction of the stucco, siding or brick veneer. If she fails to bring the claim within two years of when she first saw the water, it is time-barred.
Colorado also has a six year “statute of repose” which provides that all construction defect claims must be brought within six years of substantial completion unless the claim accrues during the fifth or sixth year. If a claim accrues in the fifth or sixth year, the claimant still has two years to bring a claim. Thus, a homebuilder may be subject to a claim as long as eight years after a home is completed. Based upon personnel changes over the years, as well as the difficulty of maintaining complete files, claims asserted long after a home has been completed are more difficult for homebuilders to effectively defend.
Based upon the lengthy period of exposure to claims, for many years the widely used design contracts developed by the American Institute of Architects (AIA) have included contractual limitation periods which substantially reduce the time within which any claims must be brought. The contracts achieve this by using language which provides that all claims are deemed to accrue at a particular time, either substantial completion of construction for claims arising prior to substantial completion or the date a certificate of final payment is issued for claims arising after substantial completion. Under contracts containing this type of provision, any claim would need to be brought within two years of issuance of a final certificate of payment at the very latest. By this means, the period of exposure to claims by the owner is dramatically reduced. Homebuilders should follow the AIA’s lead to better protect themselves.
A contractual limitations provision in a contract in Colorado is valid and enforceable as long as the period within which to bring a claim is reasonable and the provision hasn’t been waived. Therefore, homebuilders should incorporate a limitations provision in their sales contract in order to reduce their exposure to claims from eight years to a more reasonable duration of two or three years after closing. Although no Colorado decision has considered the validity of such a contract provision in the context of a home sale, that should not dissuade homebuilders from utilizing one. If they do, they might be able to avoid claims being asserted against them many years after a home is sold.
Homebuilders should note however, that, unless their contracts specifically make any subsequent purchasers of their homes intended third-party beneficiaries of the original sales contract, a contractual limitations provision will not bar claims against them by subsequent purchasers who may sue them for negligence. If homebuilders want subsequent purchasers to be bound by a contractual limitations provision (as well as the other terms of the contract) language should be added to the contract providing that subsequent purchasers are intended third-party beneficiaries of the sales contract.
A contractual limitations provision is a powerful tool which all homebuilders should consider including in their contracts. If they do, time will be on their side.
Disclaimer: The materials on this website are provided for informational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice nor do they necessarily reflect the opinions of Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. or any of its attorneys or clients. There is no implicit guarantee that this information is correct, complete, or up to date.
This website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. You should not act or rely on any information in this website without seeking the advice of an attorney.
Please be advised that any response to this web page does not create an attorney-client relationship and, therefore, no attorney-client privilege is attached by this communication. Furthermore, any information you transmit to us will not be treated as confidential. Please do not send us any information regarding any current or potential legal matter(s) absent a written statement confirming our engagement by you as your legal counsel.
In some jurisdictions, this website may be considered advertising. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon written information about qualifications and experience. Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. has made every effort to comply with all known legal and ethical requirements in providing this website. We do not desire to represent clients based upon their review of any portions of this website that do not comply with legal or ethical requirements in your jurisdiction.
This site may contain hyperlinks to websites operated by parties independent from Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. Such hyperlinks are provided for your reference only. Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. does not control such websites and is not responsible for their content. Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C.’s inclusion of hyperlinks to such websites does not imply any endorsement of the materials on such websites or any association with their content. Your access and use of such sites, including information, material, products, and services therein, shall be solely at your own risk.
Nothing contained in this website is intended to compare our services to the services of any other law firm or lawyer or to imply specialization or certification by any organization not previously approved by the Colorado State Bar Board of Legal Specialization.
The Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. law firm is responsible for the content of this website and our principal office is located at 102 S. Tejon, Suite 900, Colorado Springs, CO.