Diligent homebuilders periodically review and revise their sales contracts so that the contracts comply with various statutory requirements (and in order to protect themselves in light of the significantly reduced coverage they have under their commercial general liability insurance policies these days). For instance, most builders are familiar with the requirement they disclose in their contracts that property may be in special taxing districts. Continuing to operate under the assumption that potential home purchasers are unable to make rational decisions or adequately protect themselves, the Colorado legislature recently imposed new disclosure obligations on those who sell property in common interest communities. This column will address those new obligations.
As of January 1st of this year, sellers of residential real estate in common interest communities became obligated to provide buyers with a laundry list of documents with respect to the community’s association including, among others, the association’s bylaws, covenants, meeting minutes, and certain financial information. Further, sellers were obligated to provide the purchaser with a disclosure containing specific language in bold type. Presumably the bold type has mandated by the legislature since people know something in bold must be important and thus will read it.
Apparently not content with its recent work, the legislature has enacted new disclosure requirements effective January 1, 2007, and removed some of the 2006 requirements. Like the current statute, the new disclosure dictates that specific language be included in contracts for the sale of residential real estate in common interest communities. However, the substances of the disclosure is somewhat different. Rather than focusing on the documents which the seller was previously obligated to provide, the new statute focuses on the financial obligations which the purchaser will have if they purchase the property and the possibility that the association will put a lien on their property if assessments are not paid.
In the event a seller does not make the required disclosure, they are liable for the actual damages the purchaser suffers as a result of the failure to disclose. Those damages might include the assessments the purchaser must pay the association. Therefore, builders in common interest communities should modify their sales contracts before January 1, 2007, so as to avoid any problems. Oh, and while they are at it, they shouldn’t forget to include the insulation disclosure required by federal law if it isn’t already there.
Disclaimer: The materials on this website are provided for informational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice nor do they necessarily reflect the opinions of Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. or any of its attorneys or clients. There is no implicit guarantee that this information is correct, complete, or up to date.
This website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. You should not act or rely on any information in this website without seeking the advice of an attorney.
Please be advised that any response to this web page does not create an attorney-client relationship and, therefore, no attorney-client privilege is attached by this communication. Furthermore, any information you transmit to us will not be treated as confidential. Please do not send us any information regarding any current or potential legal matter(s) absent a written statement confirming our engagement by you as your legal counsel.
In some jurisdictions, this website may be considered advertising. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon written information about qualifications and experience. Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. has made every effort to comply with all known legal and ethical requirements in providing this website. We do not desire to represent clients based upon their review of any portions of this website that do not comply with legal or ethical requirements in your jurisdiction.
This site may contain hyperlinks to websites operated by parties independent from Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. Such hyperlinks are provided for your reference only. Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. does not control such websites and is not responsible for their content. Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C.’s inclusion of hyperlinks to such websites does not imply any endorsement of the materials on such websites or any association with their content. Your access and use of such sites, including information, material, products, and services therein, shall be solely at your own risk.
Nothing contained in this website is intended to compare our services to the services of any other law firm or lawyer or to imply specialization or certification by any organization not previously approved by the Colorado State Bar Board of Legal Specialization.
The Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. law firm is responsible for the content of this website and our principal office is located at 102 S. Tejon, Suite 900, Colorado Springs, CO.