Search Site
Menu
Sub Contractors: The Builder’s Greatest Asset

Author: KARL A. BERG, JR.

An attorney once told me: “The practice of law would be great if we didn’t have to deal with clients.” Probably more than a few homebuilders have expressed similar sentiments with respect to their subcontractors. Although there are a few subcontractors who are not conscientious in one or more respects, the vast majority of them take pride in their work and value their relationships with their builder clients. As such, builders should recognize that their subcontractors are important assets, integral to their ultimate success. This column will discuss a few ways in which builders can make subcontractors understand and appreciate their importance in the homebuilding process.

First and foremost, builders should develop and consistently use a subcontract which provides reasonable protection to both the builder and subcontractor. Too often, based upon the disparity in bargaining power, builders are able to have subcontractors sign overly burdensome subcontracts. While builders may correctly believe that such one-sided agreements will benefit them should a dispute arise, they may be disregarding the demoralizing effect such agreements have on their subcontractors which, too often, believe they are completely at the builder’s mercy. Further, unfair agreements probably diminish the subcontractors’ trust in the builder. Since trust is the basis of all successful relationships, it is thus in the builder’s best interest to treat their subcontractors fairly from the beginning of the relationship. Having a reasonable and fair subcontract will go a long way to convince subcontractors that the builder isn’t looking to take advantage of them should a dispute arise.

If a builder is well organized, particularly with respect to scheduling work, it shows the builder values their subcontractors. The statement “Time is Money” is especially true in construction. If a builder fails to properly schedule its subcontractors and requires that they repeatedly return to a site which is not ready, they will become frustrated due to the unrecoverable costs they incur. This may lead to inattention to the work or a rush to compete it which will adversely affect its quality. If either of these things occurs, the builder will ultimately pay a higher cost as a result of poor quality work and customer dissatisfaction. Therefore, builders should invest the proper resources to show subcontractors that they value them and recognize their subcontractors’ time is worth something.

Builders should avoid requesting subcontractors complete work outside the scope of their agreements without compensation or requesting work which isn’t legitimate warranty work. Based upon the leverage they have over subcontractors, builders may be tempted to request extras without paying for them. Implicit in the request is the possibility that if the subcontractor isn’t a “team player” by helping the builder out, the builder will find a subcontractor who will. This is unfair and only reinforces the subcontractors’ belief that builders will take advantage of them if they can. Likewise, in order to keep their customers happy, a builder may be tempted to have subcontractors do “warranty” work which work is necessary as a result of the customer’s (or their children’s) negligence or failure to properly maintain the home. This practice must also be avoided. While builders must be attentive to their customers, simply because the subcontractor will bear the cost of the work is not a legitimate reason to have it done.

Finally, builders should promptly pay their subcontractors. As many subcontractors cannot afford not to be paid, they will genuinely appreciate being paid on time.

Builders looking for long term success will recognize that loyal subcontractors are their most valuable asset. Thus, builders must treat them as assets rather than liabilities which is too often the case. If they do not, their subcontractors will become a liability which may ultimately lead to the builder’s failure.


Disclaimer: The materials on this website are provided for informational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice nor do they necessarily reflect the opinions of Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. or any of its attorneys or clients. There is no implicit guarantee that this information is correct, complete, or up to date.

This website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. You should not act or rely on any information in this website without seeking the advice of an attorney.

Please be advised that any response to this web page does not create an attorney-client relationship and, therefore, no attorney-client privilege is attached by this communication. Furthermore, any information you transmit to us will not be treated as confidential. Please do not send us any information regarding any current or potential legal matter(s) absent a written statement confirming our engagement by you as your legal counsel.

In some jurisdictions, this website may be considered advertising. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon written information about qualifications and experience. Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. has made every effort to comply with all known legal and ethical requirements in providing this website. We do not desire to represent clients based upon their review of any portions of this website that do not comply with legal or ethical requirements in your jurisdiction.

This site may contain hyperlinks to websites operated by parties independent from Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. Such hyperlinks are provided for your reference only. Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. does not control such websites and is not responsible for their content.  Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C.’s inclusion of hyperlinks to such websites does not imply any endorsement of the materials on such websites or any association with their content. Your access and use of such sites, including information, material, products, and services therein, shall be solely at your own risk.

Nothing contained in this website is intended to compare our services to the services of any other law firm or lawyer or to imply specialization or certification by any organization not previously approved by the Colorado State Bar Board of Legal Specialization.

The Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. law firm is responsible for the content of this website and our principal office is located at 102 S. Tejon, Suite 900, Colorado Springs, CO.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

MULLIKEN LAW IN THE COMMUNITY
Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. attorneys are active in the community, frequently in the news and prolific writers, keeping the public and their fellow lawyers abreast of the newest concepts affecting the nation and residents of Colorado. We’re proud of the work we do for the people of Colorado and how we influence business and government. Below, we’ve provided our recent news articles, community engagement events and publications for your review.
  • "Court Rules in Favor of Colorado Springs Church Represented by Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet, P.C. ..."  -December 18, 2018

  • "Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet, P.C. client receives $850,000 in settlement of dispute over Greenhouse in Pueblo, Colorado..."  -December 18, 2018

  • "Successful Defense of Federal Civil RICO Action. David Slays Goliath– In September, 2018, Murray Weiner successfully ..."  -October 23, 2018

  • "Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. Prevails In Land Use Case In The Colorado Court Of Appeals...."  -May 17, 2016

  • "Trial Court Enters Permanent Injunction In Favor Of Firm Client..."  -May 17, 2016

  • "Roofing Contractor Successfully Weathers Owner's Breach of Contract Claim"  - July 15, 2013

  • "House Rocks, Home Seller Rolls to Defense Verdict and Attorney Fee Award on Fraud Claim..."  - January 15, 2013

  • "Custom Home Project Turns from Nightmare to Dream after Default Termination Validated By Arbitrator and Damages Awarded...."  -August 15, 2012

  • "Court Determines that Zoning Ordinances and Waterline Easement Survive Foreclosure Action Initiated by Private Lender in Douglas County, Colorado..."  -January 14, 2011